compareM2 G87 vs M3 G80

BMW M2 G87 vs BMW M3 G80

2 reviewers · 4 head-to-head calloutsZygrene · 1·TFLnow · 1
// two characters, one road
M2 G87
The Sharp Value Coupe

The shortest-wheelbase S58 car and the sharpest M2 to date — the most livable everyday footprint at roughly half the M3's money, if you can do without the back seat and the Competition's extra muscle.

Pick it if you want the sharpest, most affordable way into the S58 — a compact coupe that's the easiest to live with day to day — and you don't need four doors or the top-tier power.

M3 G80
The Fast Practical Sedan

The same straight-six wound up to 543 hp, wrapped in a real four-door that hides its two tonnes and still does the school run — for nearly twice the M2's price.

Pick it if you want power and practicality together — 500-plus hp and a genuine back seat in a car that drives far smaller than it is — and the ~$110k doesn't faze you.

00// bottom line

Same S58 twin-turbo straight-six, two different missions: the M2 is the compact, sharper, far cheaper one; the M3 is the more powerful, more practical, far pricier one.

The G87 M2 is the value-and-sharpness play — the shortest-wheelbase S58 car, reviewers' pick as the sharpest M2 yet, and the most usable everyday footprint, from around $63k. It gives up outright power and a proper back seat.

The G80 M3 brings the muscle and the practicality — up to 543 hp in the hottest CS, genuine four-door usability, and agility that belies its near-two-tonne mass — for roughly $110k.

Both still offer a manual. The decision is size, doors and budget more than pace: the tight cheap coupe, or the fast usable sedan.

// the five aspects — one at a time
01// the matchup

Performance

M2
4.5/5
M3wins
5.0/5
M3 WINSThe G80 M3 has a higher factory power output.
M2G874.5/5positive2 clips

It's got the same S 58 3-litre twin turbo straight six as the M4 competition, and as such, it makes the same 523bhp.

0:39CAR magazine · 0:39impression

this car is so much faster really I think this should be called an M3 and the G80 M3 should be called an M5

7:36Zygrene · 7:36impression
M3G805.0/5positive2 clips

the base M3 and 2025 M2 make 473 horsepower

0:49Zygrene · 0:49wins here

the difference is 543 horsepower and 479 lb feet of torque and that's 40 horsepower over the M3 competition.

1:16TFLnow · 1:16wins here
02// the matchup

Handling

M2even
4.5/5
M3even
4.5/5
EVEN READno clear edge
M2G874.5/5positive2 clips

it's also a lot more confidence inspiring in the corners it does a good job hiding its mass at Canyon speeds

5:47Zygrene · 5:47impression

It's the sharpest M2 to date, and it might be the sharpest thing coming out of Munich wearing an M badge.

8:44Brian Makse · 8:44impression
M3G804.5/5positive2 clips

It just feels incredibly agile and you completely forget you've got an entire estate body style behind you.

10:26CAR magazine · 10:26impression

you wouldn't think a two-ton car could be so fun to drive but this really does handle like it's so much lighter

9:56Zygrene · 9:56impression
03// the matchup

Fun to drive

M2even
4.5/5
M3even
4.5/5
EVEN READno clear edge
M2G874.5/5positive2 clips

I feel like it's a little bit notchier than the rest. Say the M3 and M4 for example, and even the Z4 hand shelter. This is my favorite shifter, I believe, out of all of those.

23:55TopherDrives · 23:55impression

The BMW just matches on outright excitement. And it does do that really, really well.

11:45CAR magazine · 11:45impression
M3G804.5/5positive2 clips

All in, the drivetrain is hugely enjoyable. It's not just brutally effective, but it's responsive and exciting, too.

8:27CAR magazine · 8:27impression

I think BMW is starting to go back into the right direction with their M cars making them a little bit more fizzy a little bit more visceral

13:12TheTopher · 13:12impression
04// the matchup

Daily drivability

M2wins
4.0/5
M3
4.0/5
M2 WINSM2 seats are more comfortable than the aggressive M3 CS buckets.
M2G874.0/5positive2 clips

It is undoubtedly the most usable everyday car. I don't think that's really up for debate.

12:33CAR magazine · 12:33impression

excellent body control in all three modes Comfort Sport and Sport Plus but the car also just soaks up the bumps with so much more ease

5:31Zygrene · 5:31impression
M3G804.0/5positive

The back seat of the m3cs is without a doubt more comfortable than the m2's back seat because you have a lot more space I'd even argue that it's probably more comfortable than the front seats in this M3.

9:41TFLnow · 9:41trails here
05// the matchup

Value

M2wins
3.0/5
M3
3.0/5
M2 WINSM2 is significantly more affordable.
M2G873.0/5positive

This M2 on the other hand is about $63,000 starting price so if you want to get into something more affordably certainly this is the way to go.

12:46TFLnow · 12:46wins here
M3G803.0/5positive2 clips

If you're going to spend most of your time on road though and you don't visit the track, then I think the good thing is that it's not compromised, but it's certainly not worth an extra £36,000.

21:52CAR magazine · 21:52impression

If you consider the fact that this is $110,000 luxury sedan, maybe would like to see some standard adaptive cruise, but it's probably the only thing I'm going to say negatively about this car.

34:48TopherDrives · 34:48impression
06// the footage

Hear it in the reviewer’s words

TFLnow
Posted Nov 20, 2023Open on YouTube
Moments worth your time
Zygrene
Posted Nov 27, 2024Open on YouTube
Moments worth your time